I recently finished reading Greg Koukl’s new book, The Story of Reality. In fact, I read it twice – and I rarely read a book more than once. Koukl contends that while most Christians know most of the bits and pieces of the Christian worldview, few know how to put those pieces together in a coherent fashion to form a truly Christian worldview. They may have a lot of knowledge about the Bible’s contents (micro-level understanding), but few understand the overarching Biblical storyline (macro-level understanding). The Story of Reality sets out to tell that story, breaking it up into five major areas: God, man, Jesus, cross, and final resurrection.
March 27, 2017
March 10, 2017
When it comes to neo-Darwinian evolution, the question isn’t whether Darwin’s proposed mechanism of biological change is true – we know it is because we observe it in nature. The question is whether it can explain what Darwin thought it explained: the diversity of life.
While the process of natural selection working on random mutations (NS+RM) is too slow to observe in mammals, we can observe the equivalent of millions of years of mammalian evolution in mere decades using microbial life and viruses. Experimental data over the last ~20 years has shown that while natural selection working on random mutations does produce change and variation within microbial species, it does not create new species.
February 21, 2017
Atheists claim that nature is all that exists. If nature made us, then what made nature? After all, the scientific evidence tells us physical reality had a beginning. Things which begin to exist need a cause, so nature needs a cause. That cause must be supernatural (beyond nature) by definition. God is what made nature.
But if God made nature, what made God? Nothing. Unlike nature, God is eternal. Things that are eternal never begin to exist, so they do not need a cause. How do we know God is eternal? Time is a feature of the physical world, so it began to exist when nature began to exist. That which brings time into existence cannot itself be temporal, but must be eternal. God is eternal. Nature is not. That’s why nature needs a cause but God does not.
February 14, 2017
Liberals love to label those who have ethical objections to cloning, doubts about man-made global warming, and the like as “science deniers” and “climate change deniers.” Matt Walsh suggests that we start calling those who deny that one’s biological sex determines their actual gender as “biology deniers.” And in this case, the term is an accurate description rather than a derogatory, non-descriptive insult. Those who want to normalize transgender thoughts are truly denying biology. They affirm that someone who is biologically male is actually female.
Transgender advocates aren’t the only biology deniers. So are abortion advocates. They deny the biological fact that the unborn are human beings from the moment of conception.
So the next time you meet someone who is arguing for abortion or transgenderism, ask they why they are a biology denier.
February 8, 2017
Those who are opposed to state and federal defunding of Planned Parenthood argue that these dollars are not paying for abortions, but contraception and other female-related health services. So why would pro-lifers want to defund this? Do we just hate women? Do we want to ensure that more women are “punished” for premarital sex by getting pregnant? Of course not. What we understand is that the grants Planned Parenthood receives for their non-abortion services indirectly funds their abortion business. To see why, imagine for a moment that the government provided grants to churches to pay for all of their office supplies, marriage counselors, city permits, and building repairs. Would the pro-Planned Parenthood-funding crowd agree with the government that this is not supporting religion? Of course not! They realize that the money a church saves by not having to pay for those government-funded items will be redirected to evangelistic efforts. So while the government’s funds would not be directly funding Christian evangelism, they are indirectly funding it. The same is true of federal funding of Planned Parenthood. While these funds are not directly responsible for aborting babies, they are indirectly responsible because Planned Parenthood can use all of the money the government saved them and direct it to their abortion business. And when 41% of their revenue comes from government, that’s a lot of money to redirect to their abortion business.
February 7, 2017
Leave a Comment
Great op-ed piece in the LA Times about the futility of gender-neutral parenting. Liberals think it’s a great idea, but kids have a way of exposing a stupid idea for what it is.
February 3, 2017
Leave a Comment
Doctors have found a way to communicate with locked-in patients. Perhaps surprisingly to some, most report being “happy” despite having what most would considerable to be a miserable existence. We often think to ourselves that life would not be worth living if we had X debilitating condition, and yet, those in such a condition usually want to go on living. We need to be very careful about making value judgments considering how worthwhile one’s life is. While we may not be able to imagine how life would be worth living if we were to experience some major illness like locked-in syndrome, it’s amazing how those who experience such conditions continue to find meaning and value in life. Every life is valuable, and even those who are experiencing terrible suffering still prefer life over death. Life is precious.